Announcement PDF 25 June 2025 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT SOIL SAMPLING RESULTS IDENTIFY 1.75KM GOLD ANOMALY AT MIRIAM Highlights  Fifteen (15) anomalous gold zones identified from detailed review of recent and historical surface geochemistry at Miriam.  Emergence of the 1.75km geochemical and geophysical Canyon target  Numerous soil samples returned results above 0.1 g/t Au, with a peak value of 3.03 g/t Au highlighting the potential for shallow, high-grade gold discoveries at Miriam.  Many of the anomalous zones are coincident with previously identified structural targets produced from magnetic geophysics 1.  Results serve to further upgrade Forrest and numerous regional targets including the Jungle structural trend.  Historical drilling of the Forrest prospect intercepted 2: ─ 12m @ 2.09 g/t Au from 60m (MRC97-15) ─ 10m @ 2.51 g/t Au from 30m (FGA002) ─ 10m @ 2.09 g/t Au from 30m and 4m @ 4.86 g/t Au from 73m (MRC97-5) ─ 5m @ 7.35 g/t Au from 70m (MRC97-25)  Initial Reverse Circulation (RC) drill program at Miriam, focused on the Forrest and Canyon targets, remains on track to commence in July 2025.  FBM remains well-funded to undertake all planned exploration activities through 2025 and beyond with a strong cash balance of A$7.4 million and zero debt (as at 31 March 2025). Future Battery Minerals Ltd (ASX: FBM) (FBM or the Company) is pleased to advise that it has completed its detailed review of surface geochemistry for its 100%-owned Miriam Project, located in the W.A. Goldfields region of Western Australia. FBM Managing Director and CEO, Nick Rathjen, commented: “Our boots on the ground and activity focused exploration strategy have returned exceptional results, strongly evidenced by the growing exploration potential across our broader Coolgardie portfolio. The soil sample results have identified 15 new anomalous gold zones with up to 3.03 g/t Au highlighting the opportunity for further shallow, high-grade gold discoveries. Importantly, the emergence of the Canyon target with a 1.75km striking anomaly is untested and increases the scale potential for the project. Ground preparations are underway for the upcoming initial drill program at Miriam that remains on track to commence in July. In light of the strong geophysical and geochemical results and scale of the Canyon target, it’s now advanced to drill ready status and will be tested alongside Forrest in this program.” 1 2 Refer to FBM ASX announcement dated 17 June 2025 Refer to FBM ASX announcement dated 27 May 2025 Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 1 Soil sampling results identify significant gold anomalies The Miriam Project tenure covers a region of the Coolgardie Greenstone Belt overlying series of formations and structural trends that host multiple nearby gold deposits, including Horizon Minerals’ Burbanks (466 koz @ 2.4 g/t Au), Beacon Minerals’ McPhersons Reward (132 koz @ 1.2 g/t Au) and Focus Minerals’ Three Mile Hill Mining Centre (2.7 Moz @ 1.8 g/t Au). 3 Figure 1: Regional map of FBM’s Coolgardie Projects and other nearby operation4 MacPhersons refer to Beacon Minerals ASX Announcement dated 6th November 2024, Three Mile Hill refer to Focus Minerals ASX Announcement dated 1st December 2023. Refer to Horizon Minerals Reserves & Resources 4 Bullabulling refer to Minerals 260 ASX Announcement dated 14th January 2025 3 Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 2 Following its 100% acquisition of all mineral rights for the Miriam Project in May 2025, FBM commenced a detailed assessment of gold prospectivity at Miriam. This included a comprehensive review of available historical geological and drilling data, which resulted in the discovery of historical gold mineralised intercepts at Forrest and the identification of numerous other gold occurrences at Forrest South, Jungle and Goroke (refer ASX releases dated 19 May 2025 and 27 May 2025). More recently, FBM completed a review of magnetic geophysics, resulting in the identification of 13 prospective targets which include both broad and discrete structures of interest (refer ASX release dated 17 June 2025). FBM’s review of surface geochemistry is now also complete. These works were conducted with the aim of identifying areas of elevated or anomalous gold and to consider their importance for the targeting of shallow regolith and bedrock hosted gold. The Company collated all surface geochemical sampling conducted on the tenement, with a focus on soil sampling. The evaluated results also included approximately 300 samples recently collected by FBM and submitted to LabWest for analysis. This process involved the use of Ultrafine+™, an Ultra Fine Fraction process which tests clay particle size fraction soils for gold and gold pathfinder elements. The subsequent desktop data review incorporated all soil sampling results, combined with historical datasets previously collated by Corazon Mining (ASX: CZN) and verified by FBM. This geochemical review has been a critical piece of FBM’s ongoing evaluation of gold prospectivity at Miriam. Results from this review highlight that gold values of <10ppb Au were a reliable base/background level of gold in the in the surface soils and sediments. Values of >20ppb Au were thus deemed to be at least double the background level and considered anomalous. Given these ranges, fifteen (15) anomalous zones indicating potential subsurface gold mineralisation have been identified and warrant follow-up exploration. Several samples returned relatively high grades for soil sampling, ranging between >0.1 g/t Au and a peak of 3.03 g/t Au. This evidences the fertility of Miriam and the surrounding area and highlights the strong underlying potential for further shallow oxide or bedrock gold discoveries. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 3 Figure 2: Miriam soil sampling results Importantly, many of these gold anomalies are coincident with the previously reported structural targets derived from the geophysical litho-structural interpretation conducted by FBM and its geophysical consultants, Southern Geoscience Consulting. FBM considers the targets where strong coincidence across multiple data sets have been observed to be of top priority for upcoming drill testing. A key observation is that FBM can draw insights from the known mineralisation at Forrest – where bedrock intercepts from drilling share a strong correlation to elevated gold-in-soils and distinct magnetic features – and identify commonalities to other targets. In particular, at the newly defined Canyon target, a large approximate 1.75 km long gold anomaly in soils is overlapping with a 1.75 km structural target with numerous features similar to Forrest. This structural and geochemical trend has become a high priority target to be drill tested in the upcoming programme. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 4 Figure 3: Miriam key geophysical / structural targets Upcoming work programmes FBM remains on track to commence an initial RC drill programme at Miriam in July 2025. The programme is set to focus on initial targets within the Forrest prospect, which boasts historical gold intercepts, and the new Canyon target. All key permits are in place, including an approved Conservation Management Plan and granted drilling Program of Work. A second heritage survey is also scheduled to commence in July 2025, covering prospective areas which FBM intends to test in subsequent drilling scheduled for late Q3 2025. FBM field personnel are also currently conducting further ground truthing of the recently identified geochemical and structural anomalies in preparation for the drill testing of priority targets in the upcoming programmes. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 5 This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Directors of the Company. -ENDFor further information visit www.futurebatteryminerals.com or contact: Nicholas Rathjen Robin Cox CEO & Managing Director Technical Director E: nrathjen@futurebatteryminerals.com.au E: rcox@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Competent Persons Statement The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Robin Cox BSc (E.Geol), a Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Cox is the Company’s Chief Geologist and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Cox consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Forward-Looking Statements This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Future Battery Minerals Limited’s planned exploration programme and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as “could,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may”, “potential”, “should,” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Future Battery Minerals Limited believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties, and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Previously Reported Results The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is extracted from the ASX announcements (Original Announcements), as referenced, which are available at www.futurebatteryminerals.com.au. FBM confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the Original Announcements and, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the Original Announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed. FBM confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Persons’ findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 6 About Future Battery Minerals (ASX: FBM) THE BUSINESS: Gold and lithium exploration and development Future Battery Minerals (ASX: FBM) is an exploration and development company focused on rapidly advancing its world-class gold and lithium projects in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. THE LOCATION: Infrastructure-rich project setting The Eastern W.A. Goldfields is an outstanding location in which to explore for, build, and operate gold and lithium mines. It is a longestablished mining province with all the accompanying benefits, including all-year land access, skilled labour, mining services and infrastructure. We are positioned just 15km south of the mining hub of Coolgardie (via sealed road), approximately 370km to the port of Esperance and approximately 550km to Perth via road and rail. We are proximal to multiple gold and lithium mining and processing operations and development projects of substantial scale. This available range of potential commercialisation options, including standalone development, positions us well to monetise current and future success. THE TEAM: Proven value generators Our carefully assembled team has an extensive track record of exploration success, project stewardship, development expertise and operating excellence that has repeatedly resulted in the delivery of substantial shareholder value: Nick Rathjen (MD), Robin Cox (Technical Director), Nev Power (Chairman), Rob Waugh (NED). THE CAPACITY: Balance sheet strength and runway We are a business and team that is resolutely focussed on the stewardship of our shareholders’ capital and the astute application of this capital for maximal return. With a cash balance of A$7.4 million and zero debt (as at 31 March 2025), we are well-funded to undertake our planned exploration, evaluation work programs and business development activities. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 7 JORC Code, 2012 Edition, Table 1 Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data CRITERIA Sampling techniques EXPLANATION • • • Drilling techniques Drill sample recovery • • • • Logging • • COMMENTARY Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Soil Sampling collects a 300g sample of fine soil from below 300mm subsurface. • Reverse Circulation drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Anomalous intercepts are then sub assayed to their 1m sample. Air Core drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Anomalous intercepts are then sub assayed to their 1m sample. Rotary Air Blast Drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • • • • • • • • • Historic results reported include drilling by Reverse Circulation (RC), Air Core (AC) and Rotary Air Blast (RAB). The drill type has been specified in the appropriate collar table. Drill Results reported are historic and FBM has relied upon public domain data reported by previous project holders. Recovery was measured/commented in sample logs. No sample bias relationship has been identified. Drill holes have been lithologically logged by geologists in the field by respective historic explorers Lithological data has been compiled. Logging is a qualitative nature. At Forrest Gold prospect primary lithology has been recorded. Not all drill logs Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 8 Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. • • • • • Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • • • include data such as oxidation, texture and structure. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • No sub sampling of soil samples. Soil was sieved using a 2mm nylon mesh Soil sampling is considered a sufficient first pass geochemical assessment of the ground where appropriate regolith exists. Geochemical anomalies are relative to the surrounding geochemistry Sampling grids are designed to cover large area’s in order to allow identification of anomalous zones 200g samples are appropriate Sampling of drill chips included compositing by spear sample on 4m composites. Single metre samples were riffle split to obtain an approximate 3kg sample. FBM soil samples were prepared by LabWest using UltraFine+TM. This collected a 2um ultrafine soil and was assayed via ICPMS. Corazon soil samples were all assayed for multi element geochemistry utilising a 4 Acid digest with ICPMS finish (MEMS61) The Historic data represented in this announcement was culminated from the exploration work conducted the following parties. Mt Kersey Mining conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1996 consisting of 9 holes. Samples were assayed via Fire Assay for gold and aqua regia digest for other elements at AAL Kalgoorlie Crest Mining conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1996 and 1997 consisting of 38 holes. Samples were assayed via PM203 at ALS laboratories Barminco conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1997 consisting of 6 holes. Samples were assayed via Fire Assay FA1 at Amdel laboratories. Spinifex Resources conducted 3 diamond core holes targeting the Miriam Nickel prospect in 2000. Samples containing gold were assayed via fire assay at Analabs Berkeley Resources conducted 3 diamond core and 1 RC hole targeting the Miriam Nickel prospect in 2004. Samples containing gold were assayed via fire assay at Analabs. Sipa Resources conducted Air Core (73 holes), RAB (63 holes) and RC (8 holes) drilling, 127 soil samples between 2005 and 2007. Samples were assayed by Ultratrace laboratories utilising methods, ICP101, ICP102, ICP302 and fire assay FA002 and FA003 Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 9 Verification of sampling and assaying • • • • Location of data points • • • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • • • • • • • • Data spacing and distribution • • • Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • • Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • • • • No independent verification has been conducted Field data is imported to the FBM geochemistry database. Duplicate samples are inserted at 1:25 No adjustments are made to assay data Soil samples were located utilising a hand held GPS with a accuracy +/-5m and via local gridding Drill holes were located utilising a hand held GPS with a accuracy +/-5m and via local gridding All drill hole collar and surface sample information has been transformed to UTM MGA 94 Zone 51 Holes were field checked by FBM utilising a hand held gps to validate the grid transformation of the historic data. Field checks found the holes to be within the error range of the hand held gps. Geospatial grid information is represented in UTM MGA 94 Zone 51 Soil sampling was conducted on 40m sample spacing and 100 and 200m line spacing. At Forrest, holes were drilled on a 40m spacing, 60m line spacing. Regional targets were drilled on greater than 80m hole spacing and greater than 80m line spacing This data spacing is appropriate for identifying continuous and noncontinuous geochemical anomalies Soil sampling has been conducted on EW grid lines. Geological units in the region have a dominantly N-S to NE-SW strike. As such the E-W drilling provides relative oblique interceptions Drilling has mostly been conducted on EW grid lines. Geological units in the region have a dominantly N-S to NE-SW strike. As such the E-W drilling provides relative oblique interceptions. Soil sampling conducted by FBM was collected by FBM geologists, secured at locked premise and transported directly to a 3rd part laboratory. • Results reported include historic sampling and FBM has relied upon public domain data reported by previous project holders. • FBM has not located historic data relating to sample security No independent audit or review has been undertaken. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 10 Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results CRITERIA Mineral tenement and land tenure status EXPLANATION • • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. COMMENTARY The Miriam Project consists of 5 prospecting leases. • Granted leases are P15/6136, P15/6137, P156138 and P15/6139. P15/6135 remains in application • Leases P15/6136-6139 are held by Coolgardie Nickel Pty Ltd, now an 100% subsidiary of Future Battery Minerals Ltd. P15/6135 is held by Limelight Industries Pty Ltd until time of grant • The tenements are located in the Kangaroo Hills Timber Reserve, an approved Conservation Management Plan provides conditional access to the tenure. • The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments exist. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. The Historic data represented in this announcement was culminated from the exploration work conducted the following parties. • Mt Kersey Mining conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1996 consisting of 9 holes. Samples were assayed via Fire Assay for gold and aqua regia digest for other elements at AAL Kalgoorlie • Crest Mining conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1996 and 1997 consisting of 38 holes. Samples were assayed via PM203 at ALS laboratories • Barminco conducted Reverse Circulation drilling in 1997 consisting of 6 holes. Samples were assayed via Fire Assay FA1 at Amdel laboratories. • Spinifex Resources conducted 3 diamond core holes targeting the Miriam Nickel prospect in 2000. Samples containing gold were assayed via fire assay at Analabs • Berkeley Resources conducted 3 diamond core and 1 RC hole targeting the Miriam Nickel prospect in 2004. Samples containing gold were assayed via fire assay at Analabs. • Sipa Resources conducted Air Core (73 holes), RAB (63 holes) and RC (8 holes) drilling and collected 127 soil samples between 2005 and 2007. Samples were assayed by Ultratrace laboratories utilising methods, ICP101, ICP102, ICP302 and fire assay FA002 and FA003 Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The tenements are prospective for lode and structurally hosted gold Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383 7817 ABN 91 148 966 545 futurebatteryminerals.com.au ASX: FBM Follow Us 11 Drill hole Information Data aggregation methods Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths Diagrams A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of highgrade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. • mineralisation hosted within Archean aged greenstone lithologies. The project is also prospective for Lithium, Caesium, Tantalum (LCT) enriched pegmatites which intrudes older Archean aged greenstone lithologies. Drill Holes reported were announced on the 27 May 2025. Maximum Au assay has been represented in the maps. • • • • • Soil Anomalies have been grouped into following bins, <5ppb, 5-10ppb, 10-20ppb, 20-50ppb, 50-100ppb, 100-200ppb and >200ppb Maximum down hole gold assays have been included in maps. Cutoff ranges are shown in legends Significant intercepts are considered as intercepts >0.1g/t Au and include up to 1m internal dilution. This is considered a significant intercept for first pass drilling technique such as RAB and AC. All results are reported as down hole length only. Mineralisation is interpreted as flat lying lodes however geological understanding is still insufficient and further drilling planned by FBM aims to address the uncertainty. • Relevant diagrams have been included within the announcement. Future Battery Minerals Ltd info@futurebatteryminerals.com.au Suite 10, 38 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6383