Announcement PDF ASX Announcement 20 October 2026 ASX: OR3 Follow Us E. info@oreresources.com.au P. +618 6383 7817 oreresources.com.au ORE Resources Suite 2, Level 2, 34 Colin St, West Perth WA 6005 AIRCORE DRILLING COMMENCED AT AVOCA GOLD PROJECT Ore Resources Ltd (ASX: OR3) (Ore or the Company) is pleased to provide an update on the expansive gold focused Phase 4 drilling programme in progress at its Coolgardie Gold Projects, located in the W.A. Goldfields. HIGHLIGHTS • 3,000m Aircore (AC) drilling programme underway at the Avoca Gold Project (Avoca), located in the northern area of Ore’s Coolgardie Gold Project landholdings. • Programme represents the first drilling at Avoca in approximately 15 years, designed to test mineralisation previously identified through historical drilling and new prospective gold targets. • Ultra Fine Fraction (UFF) soil geochemistry has identified nine (9) +40ppb Au anomalies, with strike lengths of up to 1.7km, further highlighting Avoca's exploration potential. • Magnetic litho-structural interpretation has identified ten (10) priority structural targets, coincident with surface gold anomalism and historical gold intersections. • Follow-up of historical intercepts, including 4m @ 14.04 g/t Au from 36m within 44m @ 1.84 g/t Au from 16m (AVRC002)1 . • The majority of these targets remain untested by historical drilling, highlighting substantial gold exploration upside. • Drilling scheduled through October to November 2026, with results expected from December, to guide follow-up exploration and target prioritisation across future drilling programmes in 2027. • First-pass AC drilling activities to subsequently shift to the Mt Monger Gold Project (Mt Monger), part of Ore’s Kal East Gold Projects: • Ore is well funded and strongly positioned to advance all planned exploration across its WA Goldfields portfolio, with a robust cash balance of A$6.8 million and zero debt (as at 30 June 2026). Ore Resources’ Managing Director and CEO, Nick Rathjen, commented: “The commencement of AC drilling at Avoca marks the first of several exploration programmes planned across our expanded gold project portfolio through Q4 2026 and into 2027. “Through the integration of recent UFF soil geochemistry and detailed magnetic litho-structural interpretation, we have generated a compelling suite of largely untested gold targets. This work has identified nine gold anomalies exceeding 40ppb Au and ten priority structural targets. Several of these targets are supported by a confluence of geochemical and geophysical signatures as well as encouraging historical drilling results. “The scale of these targets is particularly compelling, with gold anomalies extending for up to 1.7km in strike and structural corridors extending for up to 1.3km. Despite these strong geological indicators, many of these targets have seen little to no effective drill testing, providing a genuine opportunity for new gold discoveries. 1 Refer to OR3 ASX release dated 16 March 2026, “Expansion of Coolgardie Gold & Lithium Project” oreresources.com.au 2 “Our target generation strategy to date has delivered significant exploration success across the Coolgardie Gold Projects, and we are excited to commence drill testing at Avoca. Importantly, this represents the first drilling at the project in approximately 15 years and provides an opportunity to unlock significant value from a highly prospective yet underexplored area. “With drilling now underway at Avoca and our AC rigs set to advance directly to Mt Monger, we are building strong exploration momentum across both our Coolgardie and Kal East project areas in Q4 2026 and into 2027.” AC drilling programme underway at Avoca As part of its 30,000m Phase 4 drilling program across 2026, Ore has commenced initial drill testing of gold prospectivity at Avoca with a 3,000m AC drilling programme. The programme is designed to test extensions to known gold mineralisation, historical drill intercepts and a number of newly generated exploration targets identified through recent systematic exploration. Figure 1: AC Drill Rig at Avoca oreresources.com.au 3 Ore has applied its proven target generation methodology at Avoca through the integration of UFF soil geochemistry completed during August and September 2026 accompanied by detailed interpretation of open- source magnetic geophysical datasets. This work has identified nine (9) surface gold anomalies exceeding 40ppb Au and ten (10) priority litho-structural targets. Figure 2: Avoca – Soil Geochemistry Results The scale of the target footprint is particularly noteworthy, with individual geochemical anomalies extending for up to 1.7km in strike length and litho-structural targets extending for up to 1.3km (Figure 2 & 3). Despite their scale, many of these targets remain largely untested by historical drilling, highlighting the potential for the discovery of substantial new gold mineralised systems within the project area. oreresources.com.au 4 Encouragingly, several targets are defined by coincident geochemical and structural signatures and are further supported by limited historical drilling that returned anomalous gold results. The convergence of these datasets significantly enhances the prospectivity of the identified targets and prioritises them for drill testing. Figure 3: Avoca – Integrated Targeting Map Overlaid with Magnetic Geophysics RTP 1VD TILT AC drilling is expected to continue through October and November 2026, with results to guide follow-up exploration and target evaluation across the broader Coolgardie Gold Projects. Following completion of the AC oreresources.com.au 5 drilling programme at Avoca, Ore will then focus on first-pass AC drilling at Mt Monger, part of its Kal East Gold Projects. Avoca overview Avoca comprises 6.7km2 of prospective exploration tenure located to the north of Ore’s Miriam and Burbanks East Gold Projects. The Avoca tenure is situated along the highly endowed Kunanalling Shear Zone, a major structural corridor hosting mafic, ultramafic and sedimentary rock units. Historical exploration and prospecting activities across the tenure have highlighted numerous mineralised gold trends, including a standout intercept of 4m @ 14.04 g/t Au from 36m within 44m @ 1.84 g/t Au from 16m (AVRC002)2 . Other key significant historical intercepts include • 4m @ 1.49 g/t Au from 41m (AVR244) • 3m @ 1.68 g/t Au from 30m (AVR284) • 4m @ 1.47 g/t Au from 28m (AVRC007) • 3m @ 2.13 g/t Au from 35m (AVR040) • 1m @ 2.04 g/t Au from 16m (AVR264) • 2m @ 1.48 g/t Au from 47m (AVR0703) Ore's review of historical drilling also defined a mineralised trend extending approximately 300m along strike in the southern portion of the project area. This trend hosts several economic-grade gold intersections yet remains only sparsely drill tested. Mineralisation identified to date is largely confined to shallow regolith, highlighting the potential for near-surface oxide gold mineralisation. Importantly, the primary fresh rock gold lodes, interpreted to be the source of the oxide mineralisation, remain largely untested by drilling, presenting a compelling opportunity to define gold mineralisation both along strike and at depth. 2 Refer to OR3 ASX release dated 16 March 2026, “Expansion of Coolgardie Gold & Lithium Project” oreresources.com.au 6 Figure 4: Coolgardie Gold Projects – Location Map This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Directors of the Company. For further information, visit http://www.oreresources.com.au/ or contact: Nicholas Rathjen Robin Cox CEO & Managing Director Technical Director E: nrathjen@oreresources.com.au E: rcox@oreresources.com.au https://oreresources.com.au/link/r8XZ7r oreresources.com.au 7 Competent Persons Statement The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results pertaining to the tenements the subject of the Agreement is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Robin Cox BSc (E.Geol), a Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Cox is the Company’s Chief Geologist and Technical Director and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Cox consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Forward-Looking Statements This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Ore Resources Limited’s planned exploration programme and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as “could,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may”, “potential”, “should,” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Ore Resources Limited believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties, and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Previously Reported Results The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is extracted from the ASX announcements (Original Announcements), as referenced, which are available at www.oreresources.com.au. Ore confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the Original Announcements and, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the Original Announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed. Ore confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Persons’ findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement. oreresources.com.au 8 About Ore Resources Ltd (ASX:OR3) THE BUSINESS: Gold and lithium exploration and development Ore Resources (ASX: OR3) is an exploration and development company focused on rapidly advancing its 100% owned Coolgardie and Kal East Gold and Lithium Projects in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. THE LOCATION: Infrastructure-rich project setting The Eastern W.A. Goldfields is an outstanding location in which to explore for, build, and operate gold and lithium mines. It is a long-established mining province with all the accompanying benefits, including all-year land access, skilled labour, mining services and infrastructure. The Projects are positioned within 50km of the mining hub of Kalgoorlie (via sealed and access roads), approximately 370km to the port of Esperance and approximately 550km to Perth via road and rail. We are proximal to multiple gold and lithium mining and processing operations and development projects of substantial scale. This available range of potential commercialisation options, including standalone development, positions us well to monetise current and future success. THE TEAM: Proven value generators Our carefully assembled team has an extensive track record of exploration success, project stewardship, development expertise and operating excellence that has repeatedly resulted in the delivery of substantial shareholder value: Nick Rathjen (MD), Robin Cox (Technical Director), Nev Power (Chairman), Rob Waugh (NED). THE CAPACITY: Balance sheet strength and runway We are a business and team that is resolutely focussed on the stewardship of our shareholders’ capital and the astute application of this capital for maximal return. We are well-funded to undertake our extensive planned exploration and evaluation work programs throughout 2026 and beyond. oreresources.com.au 9 JORC Code, 2012 Edition, Table 1 Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Soil Sampling collects a 300g sample of fine soil from below 300mm subsurface. Samples were then prepared by LabWest using UltraFine+TM . This collected a 2um ultrafine fraction of the soil for geochemical analysis • Reverse Circulation drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Anomalous intercepts are then sub assayed to their 1m sample. • Air Core drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Anomalous intercepts are then sub assayed to their 1m sample. • Rotary Air Blast Drilling collects a 1m bulk sample. Sampling is then composited into 4m composites for fire assay purpose. Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • Historic results reported include drilling by Reverse Circulation (RC), Air Core (AC) and Rotary Air Blast (RAB). • The drill type has been specified in the appropriate collar table. Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • Results reported are historic and OR3 has relied upon public domain data reported by previous project holders. • Recovery was measured/commented in sample logs. • No sample bias relationship has been identified. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource • Results reported are historic and OR3 has relied upon public domain data reported by previous project holders. oreresources.com.au 10 CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • Drill holes have been lithologically logged by geologists in the field by respective historic explorers • Lithological data has been compiled. Logging is a qualitative nature. • Primary lithology has been recorded. Not all drill logs include data such as oxidation, texture and structure. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • No sub sampling of soil samples. • Soil was sieved using a 2mm nylon mesh • Soil sampling is considered a sufficient first pass geochemical assessment of the ground where appropriate regolith exists. • Geochemical anomalies are relative to the surrounding geochemistry • Sampling grids are designed to cover large area’s in order to allow identification of anomalous zones • 200g samples are appropriate • Sampling of drill chips included compositing by spear sample on 4m composites. • Single metre samples were riffle split to obtain an approximate 3kg sample. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. • OR3 soil samples were prepared by LabWest using UltraFine+TM . This collected a 2um ultrafine soil and was assayed via ICPMS. The Historic data represented in this announcement was culminated from the exploration work conducted by the following parties. • La Mancha Resources A no. 74875, 77444, 105026, 40gm Fire Assay with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, code FA_AAS, KalAssay Laboratory • Evolution Mining, A no. 108735, 40gm Fire Assay with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, code FA_AAS, KalAssay Laboratory • Avoca Resources, A no. 69974, 72272 Aqua Regia with AAS, code Au-TL43 and FA_Au_AAS at ALS Perth. • Spinifex Gold Ltd, A no. 52229, FA_Au_AAS at ALS Perth. Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • No independent verification has been conducted • Field data is imported to the OR3 geochemistry database. • No adjustments are made to assay data oreresources.com.au 11 CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Soil samples were located utilising a hand held GPS with a accuracy +/-5m and via local gridding • Drill Holes were located utilising a hand held GPS with a accuracy +/-5m and via local gridding with later transformation of local grid values. • All drill hole collar information has been transformed to UTM MGA 94 Zone 51 • Geospatial grid information is represented in UTM MGA 94 Zone 51 Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Soil sampling was conducted on 40m sample spacing and 100 and 200m line spacing. • This data spacing is appropriate for identifying continuous and non- continuous geochemical anomalies • Hole spacing ranges from 80 - 200m on drill. • This data spacing and nature of regional exploration drilling is appropriate for identifying continuous and non- continuous geochemical anomalies. Further exploration will refine larger anomalies. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Soil sampling has been conducted on E- W grid lines. Geological units in the region have a dominantly N-S to NW-SE strike. As such the E-W sampling provides relative oblique coverage. • Drilling has mostly been conducted on E/W and NE/SW grid lines. Geological units in the region have a dominantly N-S to NW-SE strike. As such the NE/SW and E-W drilling provides relative oblique interceptions. Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Soil sampling conducted by OR3 was collected by OR3 geologists, secured at locked premises and transported directly to a 3rd party laboratory. • Results reported are historic and OR3 has relied upon public domain data reported by previous project holders. • OR3 has not located historic data relating to sample security Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No independent audit or review has been undertaken. Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title The Avoca Project consists of 4 Prospecting leases. • Granted leases are P15/6998, 6999,7000 and 7001. oreresources.com.au 12 CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • Tenements have an existing Heritage Protection Agreement with the relevant Native Title Party • The tenements are in good standing and no other known impediments exist. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. The Historic data represented in this announcement was culminated from the exploration work conducted the following parties. • La Mancha Resources A no. 74875, 77444, 105026, 40gm Fire Assay with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, code FA_AAS, KalAssay Laboratory • Evolution Mining, A no. 108735, 40gm Fire Assay with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, code FA_AAS, KalAssay Laboratory • Avoca Resources, A no. 69974, 72272 Aqua Regia with AAS, code Au-TL43 and FA_Au_AAS at ALS Perth. • Spinifex Gold Ltd, A no. 52229, FA_Au_AAS at ALS Perth. Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The Avoca project is prospective for oxide, lode and structurally hosted gold mineralisation hosted within Archean aged greenstone lithologies. older Archean aged greenstone lithologies. Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • Drill Hole collar tables including location, height and drill direction have been included. (Appendix 1). • Maximum Au assay has been represented in the maps. This data is included in the collar table • Significant intercept assay data has been tabled. (Appendix 1) Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) • Maximum down hole gold assays have been included in maps. Cutoff ranges are shown in legends • Significant intercepts are considered as intercepts >0.1g/t Au and include oreresources.com.au 13 CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high- grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. up to 2m internal dilution. This is considered a significant intercept for first pass drilling technique such as RAB and AC or deeper RC. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • All results are reported as down hole length only. Mineralisation is interpreted as sub horizontal oxide lodes and potentially sub vertical fresh rock lodes, however geological understanding is still insufficient and further drilling planned by OR3 aims to address the uncertainty. Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Relevant diagrams have been included within the announcement. Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • Assay data has been represented for all holes drilled in the project area. Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. Magnetic Geophysical Data acquisition included the combination of three open file geophysical surveys. • Gunga (R60227), flown by TAG in 2000, 40m line spacing, 35m terrain clearance, 045-225 line direction • Mungari South (R56836), flown by TAG in 1998, 40m line spacing, 35m terrain clearance, 090-270 line direction. • Kalgoorlie East (R70882), flown by Thomson Aviation in 2013, 100m line spacing, 50m terrain clearance, 090- 270 line direction. Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and • OR3 plans to conduct drilling across the Avoca project in 2026. • Refer to figures/diagrams in the main body of text. oreresources.com.au 14 CRITERIA EXPLANATION COMMENTARY future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. oreresources.com.au 15 Appendix 1 – Soil Sampling Results SampleID Sample Northing Easting As_ppm Au_ppb Bi_ppm Sb_ppm W_ppm AVSS0001 SOIL 6581800 331200 31.8 7.7 0.192 0.417 0.376 AVSS0002 SOIL 6581800 331250 32.6 5.9 0.229 0.496 0.501 AVSS0003 SOIL 6581800 331300 21.7 9.8 0.249 0.476 0.514 AVSS0004 SOIL 6581800 331350 15.3 6.9 0.226 0.384 0.434 AVSS0005 SOIL 6581800 331400 19.7 7.2 0.25 0.465 0.447 AVSS0006 SOIL 6581800 331450 21.2 10.3 0.201 0.432 0.503 AVSS0007 SOIL 6582000 331050 29.1 29.7 0.177 0.447 0.376 AVSS0008 SOIL 6582000 331100 30 16.8 0.192 0.535 0.38 AVSS0009 SOIL 6582000 331150 32.8 21.3 0.137 0.501 0.414 AVSS0010 SOIL 6582000 331200 19.9 11 0.162 0.647 0.476 AVSS0011 SOIL 6582000 331250 13.8 9.3 0.136 0.328 0.307 AVSS0012 SOIL 6582000 331300 30.1 33.8 0.116 0.532 0.383 AVSS0013 SOIL 6582000 331350 80.7 7.7 0.234 0.815 1.11 AVSS0014 SOIL 6582000 331400 14.4 7.3 0.124 0.353 0.54 AVSS0015 SOIL 6582000 331450 6.1 93.4 0.147 0.242 0.556 AVSS0016 SOIL 6582000 331500 9.3 33.5 0.224 0.346 0.335 AVSS0017 SOIL 6582000 331550 7 10.4 0.146 0.203 0.302 AVSS0018 SOIL 6582000 331600 4.9 9.4 0.102 0.153 0.248 AVSS0019 SOIL 6582000 331650 4.3 4.4 0.134 0.127 0.1 AVSS0020 SOIL 6582000 331700 6.7 7.1 0.165 0.177 0.399 AVSS0021 SOIL 6582200 330850 25.6 22.4 0.128 0.332 0.282 AVSS0022 SOIL 6582200 330900 25.7 15.2 0.197 0.518 0.333 AVSS0023 SOIL 6582200 330950 40.9 9.1 0.294 0.719 0.294 AVSS0024 SOIL 6582200 331000 29.6 7.2 0.317 0.55 0.842 AVSS0025 SOIL 6582200 331050 18.7 6.3 0.267 0.401 0.442 AVSS0026 SOIL 6582200 331100 15.8 5.3 0.224 0.309 0.631 AVSS0027 SOIL 6582200 331150 17.9 6.2 0.238 0.271 0.754 AVSS0028 SOIL 6582200 331200 21.4 7.4 0.278 0.267 0.62 AVSS0029 SOIL 6582200 331250 16.8 7.1 0.234 0.211 0.646 AVSS0030 SOIL 6582200 331300 15.4 7.4 0.282 0.224 0.154 AVSS0031 SOIL 6582200 331350 12.7 11 0.245 0.258 0.421 AVSS0032 SOIL 6582200 331400 11.7 8.5 0.233 0.243 0.402 AVSS0033 SOIL 6582200 331450 14.1 12.1 0.247 0.264 0.496 AVSS0034 SOIL 6582200 331500 12.7 11.2 0.239 0.28 0.53 AVSS0035 SOIL 6582200 331550 12.2 15 0.202 0.293 0.547 AVSS0036 SOIL 6582200 331600 9.7 14.2 0.201 0.2